<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just A Little Better&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gyro.com/blog/just-a-little-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gyro.com/blog/just-a-little-better/</link>
	<description>The world&#039;s largest independent business to business marketing agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.gyro.com/blog/just-a-little-better/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyrohsr.com/blog/?p=210#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Great post. I was nodding until you said the coffee was a little better. Granted, you&#039;re in the UK, where coffee is not as much a part of the culture as here in the States. But my opinion--and from what I can tell the consensus among coffee drinkers--is that Starbucks coffee is bitter and overpriced. Even compared to other chains, it&#039;s considered rather lousy.

However, this only strengthens the point you&#039;re making above. They&#039;ve managed to make everything else &quot;a little better,&quot; and the sum of the parts is something strong enough to overpower the negative effect of their mediocre core product. Not that I&#039;d ever recommend ignoring product quality, but if the experience you create for customers (dare we call it a &quot;brand&quot;?) is well liked, you&#039;ve given your products some critical air support.

For one taste test, see here: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/food/beverages/coffee-tea/coffee-taste-test-3-07/overview/0307_coffee_ov_1.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I was nodding until you said the coffee was a little better. Granted, you&#8217;re in the UK, where coffee is not as much a part of the culture as here in the States. But my opinion&#8211;and from what I can tell the consensus among coffee drinkers&#8211;is that Starbucks coffee is bitter and overpriced. Even compared to other chains, it&#8217;s considered rather lousy.</p>
<p>However, this only strengthens the point you&#8217;re making above. They&#8217;ve managed to make everything else &#8220;a little better,&#8221; and the sum of the parts is something strong enough to overpower the negative effect of their mediocre core product. Not that I&#8217;d ever recommend ignoring product quality, but if the experience you create for customers (dare we call it a &#8220;brand&#8221;?) is well liked, you&#8217;ve given your products some critical air support.</p>
<p>For one taste test, see here: <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/food/beverages/coffee-tea/coffee-taste-test-3-07/overview/0307_coffee_ov_1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/food/beverages/coffee-tea/coffee-taste-test-3-07/overview/0307_coffee_ov_1.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

